Glow CloudKit Get the kit

Comparison

The native alternative to an embedded social feed

SociableKIT and Tagembed are good at what they are built for: dropping a social wall onto a public website, quickly, from a huge list of platforms. An intranet is a different room. There, the same widget arrives as somebody else's iframe inside a governed environment, metered by how many people look at it and branded until you upgrade. Glow Cloud Kit's Social Feed is a real SharePoint web part instead.

Side by side

From each product's public pricing and documentation. Where they genuinely do more, we say so - and on three of these rows they do.

Glow Cloud Kit SociableKIT / Tagembed
How it renders A native SharePoint web part, drawn by SharePoint itself A third-party embed: an iframe or script served by the vendor
Who sees your viewers Nobody. Nothing records which staff open which post The widget loads from the vendor's servers on every page view
View limits None. It is a web part in your tenant, not a metered service Metered: 2,000 views/mo free, 50,000 on SociableKIT Pro
Vendor branding None, on every plan Removed on paid tiers only
Looks like your intranet Inherits your SharePoint theme, section width and dark mode A generic widget styled in the vendor's own dashboard
Platforms YouTube, Bluesky, Mastodon and RSS instantly; Facebook and Instagram via a guided one-time sign-in. No LinkedIn Dozens, including LinkedIn, TikTok, X and Google Reviews
Works outside SharePoint No. It is a SharePoint Online web part Yes, on any website
Price £29/mo for the app, or £99/mo for all 18 SociableKIT $10-$40/mo; Tagembed $19-$99/mo

Honest about the difference

These solve overlapping problems in different places. On price and on platform count, they win.

Choose SociableKIT or Tagembed if…

  • You need LinkedIn, TikTok, X or Google Reviews - we do not support those, and they support dozens of sources we do not.
  • The feed has to appear on a public website too, not only inside SharePoint.
  • You want the cheapest possible single feed and the view cap is comfortably above your traffic.

Choose Glow Cloud Kit if…

  • It is going on an intranet, where "we are embedding a third-party script on the homepage" is a conversation with IT rather than a checkbox.
  • Nothing may track who reads what. No per-user analytics leave your tenant, which is a claim we publish and hold ourselves to.
  • You would rather it looked like your intranet - your theme, your section widths, your dark mode - than like a widget.
  • You want the other 17 web parts too. The whole kit is £99/mo, which is what one competitor charges for its top social plan alone.

The short version: for one social wall on a marketing site, an embed widget is the right tool and it is cheap. Inside a SharePoint intranet the trade changes: you are putting a third party's iframe on the page every employee opens, metered by views, and you still have to make it look like it belongs there.

Glow Cloud Kit's Social Feed is a SharePoint web part that renders in the page and takes its styling from the site it sits on. It reaches fewer networks than they do. It also does not count your staff.

See it on your own tenant

£99/mo for all 18, or £29/mo per part. 14-day free trial, a card is required to start, cancel anytime, no licence keys.

Other comparisons

Weighing something else up? These cover the other ways teams solve this.

Comparison based on publicly available information as of August 2026: SociableKIT's published Free / Pro / Business plans and Tagembed's published Starter / Growth / Advance plans. Competitor prices are quoted in US dollars as published; Glow Cloud Kit is sold in pounds. Platform support changes on all sides - check the current lists before deciding. SociableKIT and Tagembed are trademarks of their respective owners; this page is independent and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by either.